I'm not sure how many major-theater/major-world-power wars need to be going on at once before we'll actually call this what it is: a world war.
I know it's a big scary thing to call it a "world war" but I feel that we need to take responsibilty for all of this death and destruction before every continent is engulfed in combat.
Merriam-Webster.com defines a "world war" as: "a war engaged in by all or most of the principal nations of the world,"
That's pretty much what we've got going on here. So why not just call a spade a spade?
OH YEAH. Because then we'd have to take responsibilty for it.
Yick! Responsibility!
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz. I know it's a big scary thing to call it a "world war" but I feel that we need to take responsibilty for all of this death and destruction before every continent is engulfed in combat.
Merriam-Webster.com defines a "world war" as: "a war engaged in by all or most of the principal nations of the world,"
That's pretty much what we've got going on here. So why not just call a spade a spade?
OH YEAH. Because then we'd have to take responsibilty for it.
Yick! Responsibility!
Replies.Orignal From: Can We Call It WW III NOW???
No comments:
Post a Comment